返回总目录
The Islam Debate : Josh McDowell and John Gilchrist vs. Ahmed Deedat
The Islam Debate
Josh McDowell and John Gilchrist vs. Ahmed
Deedat
© 1983 Josh McDowell and John
Gilchrist
Here's Life Publishers, San Bernardino, California
All Rights
Reserved
Campus Crusade for Christ Book
1. Islam
Relations
Christianity. 2.
Christianity and other religions
Islam. 3. Islam
Controversial
literature. 4. Apologetics.
LC Class: BP172 .M39 1983 ~~ Dewey: 297/.1972 19 ~~
OCLC: 10162367 ~~ LCCN 83070193 ~~
199p.
The Islam Debate is presently held by 75 libraries including
Texas A & M University and Dallas Theological Seminary.
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . .
9
Why The Debate . . . . . .
. . . . 9
Why This Book . . . . . . . . .
. 11
CHAPTER ONE: Historical Background
of Islam . . . . . . . . . . 13
History . . . . . . . . . . 14
Muhammad . . . . . . . . . . 14
The Call . . . . . . . . . . 15
The Hijrah . . . . . . . . . . 17
After Muhammad's Death . . . . . . . . . .
18
Islamic Teachings . . . . . . . . . . 19
Faith and Duty . . . . . . . . . .
19
Qur'an . . . . . . . . . . 19
Six Articles of Faith . . . . . . . . . .
25
Five Pillars of Faith . . . . . . . . . .
26
Cultural Expression . . . . . . . . . . 28
Language and the Arts . . . . . . . . . .
29
The Family . . . . . . . . . . 29
Contemporary Influence . . . . . . . . . .
30
CHAPTER TWO: Teachings of Islam
. . . . . . . . . . 33
A Comparative Study of the Textual History of the
Qur'an and the Bible . . . . . . . . . . 33
Considering the Bible . . . . . . . . . .
33
Variant Readings in the Qur'an and the Bible
. . . . . . . . . . 35
The "Multiple" Bible Versions . . . . . .
. . . . 35
The Apocrypha . . . . . . . . . .
40
The "Grave Defects" . . . . . . . . . .
41
Fifty Thousand Errors? . . . . . . . . . .
42
"Allah" in the Bible? . . . . . . . . . .
45
Alleged Contradictions in the Bible . . .
. . . . . . . 46
Parallel Passages in the Qur'an and the Bible
. . . . . . . . . . 46
Considering the Qur'an . . . . . . . . . .
50
Evidence for the Reliability of the New Testament.
. . . . . . . . . 53
A True Picture . . . . . . . . . .
74
Is Muhammad Foretold in the Bible . . . . . . . .
. . 75
Old Testament References . . . . . . . . .
. 76
New Testament References . . . . . . . . .
. 83
The Gospel of Barnabas . . . . . . . . . .
90
Who Was Barnabas . . . . . . . . . .
91
Historical Background . . . . . . . . . .
91
Examination of the Gospel . . . . . . . .
. . 94
Was Barnabas Really Its Author?
. . . . . . . . . . 94
Evidence of Its Medieval Origin
. . . . . . . . . . 99
Who Actually Composed This Forgery?
. . . . . . . . . . 102
The Crucifixion and the Resurrection in the Qur'an
and the Bible . . . . . . . . . . 103
The Crucifixion of Jesus Christ in the Bible
. . . . . . . . . . 103
The Denial of the Crucifixion in the Qur'an
. . . . . . . . . . 105
The Muslim Theory of Substitution . . . .
. . . . . . 106
"Hazrat Isa Is Dead!" A Modern Alternative
. . . . . . . . . . 108
The Islamic Swoon and Its Ahmadiya Origin
. . . . . . . . . . 111
Ahmed Deedat's "Was Christ Crucified? . .
. . . . . . . . 115
What Was the Sign of Jonah? . . . . . . .
. . . 125
Muslim Confusion About the Crucifixion . .
. . . . . . . . 127
Evidence in the Bible for the Crucifixion
and Resurrection . . . . . . . . . . 128
The Resurrection . . . . . . . . . .
131
Islamic Sects/Divisions . . . . . . . . . .
132
Shi'ites . . . . . . . . . . 133
Sunnis . . . . . . . . . . 134
Sufis . . . . . . . . . . 137
Ahmadiya . . . . . .
. . . . 138
Kharijites, Mu'tazilites, Wahhabis . . . .
. . . . . . 139
CHAPTER THREE: Transcript of
the Debate . . . . . . . . . . 143
Opening Arguments . . . . . . . . . . 143
Ahmed Deedat . . . . . . . . . .
143
Josh McDowell . . . . . . . . . .
157
Rebuttals . . . . . . . . . . 172
Ahmed Deedat . . . . . . . . . .
172
Josh McDowell . . . . . . . . . .
174
Closing Statements . . . . . . . . . . 177
Ahmed Deedat . . . . . . . . . .
177
Josh McDowell . . . . . . . . . .
178
CONCLUSION: Islam and
Christianity . . . . . . . . . . 181
God . . . . . . . . . . 181
The Bible . . . . . . . . . . 182
Jesus Christ . . . . . . . . . . 184
BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . .
. . . . . 187
GLOSSARY . . . . . . .
. . . 197
INTRODUCTION
WHY THE DEBATE?
In an age which is increasingly relativistic and syncretistic,
one might ask why debate about Islam? Why not "bury the hatchet" in
a spirit of mutual trust and respect?
Christians believe firmly in respecting members of
other faiths but believe equally firmly that the salvation of the world remains
vested in the work of Jesus Christ who died for the sins of men at the cross
of Calvary.
The Qur'an affirms various things revealed about Jesus
Christ in the Bible, but it denies His divinity, crucifixion and resurrection.
In so doing it has negated the heart of the gospel, that is, the crucifixion
and resurrection of Jesus Christ. For the apostle Paul said: ". . . and if
Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless, you are still in your
sins" (1 Corinthians 15:17 NASB). The Qur'an, in denying these all-important
events in the life of Jesus, enters strongly into debate with
Christianity.
Islam is committed to challenging the claims of
Christianity. In many situations what is looked at is a false Christianity.
What is needed is not an abandonment of the contest, but for discussion to
be greatly increased in a spirit of amicability, love and mutual
understanding.
Such a debate took a place between Josh McDowell and
Ahmed Deedat, President
of the Islamic Propagation Centre in Durban, South Africa,
Page 10
during August 1981. The subject struck at the roots of the dilemma
between Islam and Christianity: "Was Christ crucified?" It was conducted
in a spirit of warmth and tolerance without either speaker being expected
to dilute his message or refrain from debating the issues head-on. Even though
it was one of the wettest periods in the history of Durban, a large crowd
of about 6,000 filled the outdoor tennis stadium. Both Muslim and Christian
participated spiritedly in the occasion. The text of the debate is recorded
at the end of this book and the open, frank, but charitable manner in which
the speakers gave account of themselves is clear for all to see.
The debate was initiated from the Muslim side. Ahmed
Deedat, a well-known Muslim public speaker in South Africa, had read Josh
McDowell's book,
Evidence
That Demands a Verdict, and during 1980 wrote to him, challenging
him to come to South Africa to debate the issues regarding the Christian
and Muslim views on the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ. This
Muslim leader had held similar debates in South Africa with other Christians,
including one with the co-author of this book, John Gilchrist, before a similar
crowd six years earlier.
Josh accepted the challenge, seeing it as an opportunity
to clarify to thousands of Muslims the essence and heart of the gospel
the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ and to clarify the
many issues that divide Muslims and Christians over the person of Jesus Christ.
Before the debate was ended, many, many Muslims were to hear, perhaps for
the first time, a clear proclamation of the gospel of God.
"You be the judge!" the posters advertising the symposium
boldly claimed. Such a debate as this could not produce a "winner" in one
sense of the word, as the issues under discussion had divided many nations
for long ages and it was hardly likely that one side would be so successful
in presenting its case that all adherents of the other would summarily abandon
their heritage and change their religion.
The great advantage of a dialogue such as this is
that the adherents of both religions gained an excellent opportunity to hear
both points of view. An atmosphere was created where each individual could
examine the claims of another religion freely while evaluating those claims
against the arguments for his own position.
As Christians, we believe that the case for the biblical
gospel is the right one, and it is our firm conviction that the arguments
set forth by
Page 11
Mr. McDowell, though limited by time, were convincing proof that
our case is a sound one. In this book the entire debate is reproduced without
bias. Accordingly, all readers, whether Christian or Muslim, are free to
judge for themselves.
We are convinced that the debate furthered the cause
of the Christian gospel among the Muslims of South Africa. With such a
conviction, we have published this book. It is our firm persuasion that it
will do much to further the ministry of the gospel to Muslims throughout
the whole world.
Josh McDowell
John Gilchrist, Esquire
Julian, California
South Africa
December 1982
December 1982
WHY THIS BOOK?
The debate has stirred a great deal of interest, in
both the United States and South Africa, in the differences between Islam
and Christianity. Therefore, we have not only published the text of the debate
in this book, but we have also included significant background material on
many of the issues that surfaced during the debate. For example, an entire
chapter deals with the issue of the Christian New Testament not being a reliable
historical document today about the life and claims of Christ. Accusations
about Christian misinterpretations of various biblical passages concerning
the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ are treated in more detail
in this book than time allowed for during the debate. Various Islamic issues
raised against Christians and their Bible were not directly addressed in
the debate, and a Christian response is given here.
Most Christians are unaware of arguments usually used
by Muslim apologists against Christianity, and, when confronted by them,
are often caught off guard. How many Christians have ever heard of the Gospel
of Barnabas? How many would know how to deal with confident Muslim claims
that the Gospel of Barnabas is the only reliable record of the life of Jesus
Christ? Now knowing that this so-called gospel is a forgery of a much later
age, the average Christian may find himself ill-equipped to give an adequate
Christian response when challenged on this point.
How many Christians could refute the bold claims made
by Muslims regarding certain biblical texts which allegedly foretell the
coming of
Page 12
Muhammad? Muslims who raise such issues are usually well prepared
with their arguments. How many Christians could give an equally confident
Christian response?
The above issues might seem obscure to most Christians,
but they form an integral part of the Muslim polemic against
Christianity.
The purpose of publishing this material is
threefold.
(1) To help Muslims and Christians alike to better
understand the similarities and differences between Islam and
Christianity.
(2) To help Christians better to relate to Muslims
as a result of a greater knowledge of the Christian/Islam conflict through
understanding some of the answers to Islamic accusations against the Christian
Bible, the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ.
(3) To encourage a bolder Christian witness and expression
of love to Muslims. One result of the preparation and research that went
into preparing for the debate and for this book is a greater respect for
Islam. It is profound faith that has the capacity to totally captivate a
person's mind, will and emotions.
I have greatly benefited personally from my involvement
and dialogue with many Muslims. This has enhanced my love for those of the
Islamic persuasion and given me a greater desire to share Christ's love and
gospel with them.
Josh McDowell helps you understand every key difference between
the Muslim and Christian faiths. If you are ready to love and share your
faith with those of the Islamic persuasion in a new way, you are ready for
The Islam Debate.
Begin reading now at Chapter
One
The
debate itself can also be found online from Josh McDowell by clicking
here
The
entire book can be found as a scanned 80 MB PDF by clicking here
The Islam Debate is hosted online by
ccel.us
christian books online
books