返回总目录
Rebuttal to Akbarally Meherally : LIES AND DECEPTION:
A LOOK AT MEHERALLY'S CRITIQUE OF SILAS' "MUHAMMAD AND THE BIBLE"
Responses to Akbarally Meherally's site
Sam Shamoun Examines
Meherally's LIES AND DECEPTION:
A LOOK AT MEHERALLY'S CRITIQUE OF SILAS' "MUHAMMAD AND THE BIBLE"
Silas: Recently I received an email from Meherally in which he states:
"Here is the URL to my recent rebuttal to your article."
Fair enough. When someone writes a rebuttal, it is hoped that he has taken the time
to understand what he is rebutting, understands the actual points in the material he
objects to, and sufficiently counters those points. We have the right to examine
Meherally抯 work and see if it is credible.
Meherally's work is found here
responding to my paper Muhammad and
the Bible.
My esteemed colleague, Mr. Sam Shamoun, had already written an analysis of
Meherally's "rebuttal." I have only added a few comments to his work.
Hence the reader may see our work switch back and forth from first person to second,
to third. It should not be difficult for the informed reader.
Sam: I choose to call Meherally's response a deception for several reasons. First
in order to call our readers' attention to Meherally's ad hominem slurs. Do note that
Meherally begins his article with the bold claim that Silas' article is a falsehood and
a deception. This is presumably done in order to poison the minds of Meherally's
readers from seriously considering Silas' arguments. Yet, all Meherally has managed
to do throughout his article is to expose his shoddy scholarship. As I shall shortly
demonstrate the only one who is promoting falsehood and lies is Meherally.
Instead of attacking a person's character and/or using cheap polemical tricks,
Meherally needs to show respect to those whom he opposes. His attacks do nothing
to help his case but only expose his immature and unprofessional attitude.
With that said, I now turn my attention to Meherally's "response."
MEHERALLY:
FALSEHOOD AND DECEPTION
The word "BIBLE"
and/or the phrase "THE HOLY BIBLE"
or their Arabic equivalents did not appear in the Qur'an that Prophet Muhammad
(peace be upon him) used to recite in his days. Neither do they appear in the copies of
the Qur'an that the Muslims do recite today. Furthermore, if one was to do the key-word
search for the words BIBLE, OLD TESTAMENT or NEW
TESTAMENT within the majority of the translated ENGLISH TEXTS of the
Glorious Qur'an, the results would be ZERO. In other words, these words or phrases DO NOT
appear in these translated texts of the Qur'an. To claim that the author of this article -
Silas, (which could be a pen name) who uses the following sub-heading, was in
reality not aware of the above mentioned facts, is to say that the author's work could not
be relied upon. To say otherwise, would be to admit
that Silas is the master of DECEPTION.
The noteworthy sub-heading to be found within the article by Silas:
C. THE QURAN STATES THAT THE BIBLE IS TRUE
RESPONSE:
Meherally抯 thrust here is that since the word "Bible" is not found in English translations
of the Quran, then my assertion "THE QURAN STATES THAT THE BIBLE IS TRUE",
is false.
At this point, I need to say to Meherally, "Meherally! Before you rebut
anything, please read all of it!!! Otherwise you appear to be a barking dog or a braying donkey."
If Meherally would have bothered to read all of my article, he would have found where
I address his question. Meherally is not the first person to make such an objection. Consequently,
I specifically addressed this in Section D, Muslim objection #2. So much time
would be saved if people bothered to read, and then be able to understand what they read.
Further, Meherally has evidently not even bothered to thoroughly read the Quran.
The claim that "Bible", "Holy Bible" or their Arabic equivalents do not
appear in the Quran is blatantly false. The term Bible comes from the Greek word Biblos,
and simply means "Book." Instead of expecting to find Bible in the Arabic Quran
we should see if whether the Quran refers to the Holy Bible by its Arabic equivalent,
namely Kitab meaning Book. This is precisely what we find the Quran calling
the previous revelation:
"The Jews say, The Christians are not (founded) upon anything. And the
Christians say, The Jews are not (founded) upon anything. And yet THEY READ
THE BOOK." S. 2:113
Ibn Ishaq presents the historical situation that led to the "sending down"
of this verse:
"When the Christians of Najran came to the apostle the Jewish rabbis came also
and they disputed one with the other before the apostle. Rafi' said, You have no
standing, and he denied Jesus and the Gospel; and a Christian said to the Jews,
You have no standing and he denied that Moses was a prophet and denied the
Torah. So God sent down concerning them: The Jews say the Christians have no
standing; and the Christians say that the Jews have no standing, and yet they read the
scriptures. They do not know what they are talking about. God will judge between them
on the day of resurrection concerning their controversy, i.e. each one reads IN
HIS BOOK THE CONFIRMATION OF WHAT HE DENIES, so that the Jews deny Jesus though THEY
HAVE THE TORAH in which God required them BY THE WORD OF MOSES TO HOLD JESUS TRUE; while
IN THE GOSPEL IS WHAT JESUS BROUGHT IN CONFIRMATION OF MOSES AND THE TORAH HE BROUGHT FROM
GOD: so each one denies WHAT IS IN THE HAND OF THE OTHER." (Alfred Guillaume,
The Life of Muhammad [Oxford University Press, Karachi], p. 258; bold and capital
emphasis ours)
Ibn Ishaq clearly states that during Muhammad's time the TAURAT OF MOSES and the GOSPEL
OF JESUS were both extant and in the HANDS of the Jews and Christians. Second, the Book
that the Jews and Christians were both reading was none other than the Holy Bible.
Since the Holy Bible in use at the time of Muhammad CONTAINED both the Old and New
Testaments, we see how blatantly false Meherally's assertion is.
Furthermore, the Quran states:
Those to whom We have given the Book STUDY IT AS IT SHOULD BE STUDIED:
They are the ones that believe therein: Those who reject faith therein,-
the loss is their own. S. 2:121
"It is not for a man to whom is given the Book and wisdom and prophecy that
he should then say to people, Be worshippers of me in place of God. But rather,
Be true teachers, since you TEACH the BOOK and you STUDY IT EARNESTLY."
S. 3:79
Again, the Book that Jews and Christians were teaching from was the Holy Bible.
The Muslim commentary, "Tafsir-ul-Qur'an", by Maulana Abdul Majid
Daryabadi, states on 2:113 that:
"The fact that both sides appealed to the same source of authority -
served also to narrow and intensify the struggle" "The new religion ...
asserted that it had been founded to fulfill the mission of Judaism, and endeavored
to prove the correctness of this allegation, FROM THE BIBLE, the very
book upon which Judaism is founded."
Daryabadi illustrates the fact that there are Quranic commentators and scholars
which recognize that the "Book" or "Scripture" in question is indeed
the Holy Bible. Other scholars include the late Muslim translator Muhammad Asad.
Asad readily acknowledged that Kitab can refer to the Bible and translated it as such.
All bold, italic and capital emphasis ours:
And, behold, there are indeed some among them who distort THE BIBLE
with their tongues, so as to make you think that [what they say] is from THE BIBLE,
the while it is not from THE BIBLE; and who say, "This is from God," the
while it is not from God: and thus do they tell a lie about God, being well aware [that it
is a lie]. S. 3:78 (Asad, The Message of the Qur'an [Dar Al-Andaulus, Gibraltar,
rpt. 1994], p. 157)
O followers OF THE BIBLE! ... O followers OF THE BIBLE!
S. 5:15, 19
(Asad, p. 144)
And so We have cast enmity and hatred among the followers OF THE BIBLE ...
If the followers OF THE BIBLE would but attain to [true] faith and
God-consciousness, we should indeed efface their [previous] bad deeds, and indeed bring
them into gardens of bliss; S. 5:64-65 (Asad, p. 157)
Say: "O followers OF THE BIBLE! You have no valid ground for your beliefs
unless you [truly] observe the Torah and the Gospel, and all that has been bestowed on you
by your Sustainer!" S. 5:68 (Asad, p. 158)
Asad also translated Kitab as Old Testament!:
THE FOLLOWERS of THE OLD TESTAMENT demand of thee [O Prophet] that thou
cause a revelation to be sent down to from heaven
S. 4:153 (Asad, p. 133)
These verses demonstrate the falsehood in Meherally's claim that the terms Bible,
Old and New Testaments and/or its Arabic equivalent do not appear in the Quran or its
translations. Meherally seems to have been aware of his falsehood and therefore very
shrewdly qualified his statement with:
... Furthermore, if one was to do the key-word search for the words BIBLE, OLD TESTAMENT or NEW TESTAMENT within
the MAJORITY of the translated ENGLISH TEXTS of the Glorious Qur'an,
the results would be ZERO ...
That Meherally could say that the majority of English translations do not contain
the terms Bible or Holy Bible implies that he was aware of the fact that there were
some translations that do contain these terms like that of Asad's. This becomes more
likely since Meherally elsewhere quotes from Asad's translation
([1],
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5]).
Since Meherally uses Asad's translation, then he must have been aware that in
certain places Asad translated the Arabic word Kitab as "Bible."
I also want to point out that Meherally's statement:
"... Furthermore, if one was to do the key-word search for the words
BIBLE, OLD TESTAMENT or NEW TESTAMENT
within the MAJORITY of the translated ENGLISH TEXTS of the Glorious Qur'an,
the results would be ZERO"
is somewhat dim. A person does not "search within a majority of texts."
A person searches the texts and then perhaps finds a majority. Again, Meherally
displays some stunted logic skills.
Additional evidence that the Quran confirms the entire Bible, and not just the Taurat,
Psalms and the Gospel, includes the following passages:
"The Messenger believeth in what hath been revealed to him from his Lord,
as do the men of faith. Each one (of them) believeth in Allah, His angels,
HIS BOOKS, and His messengers. 'We make no distinction (they say)
between one and another of His messengers.' And they say: "We hear, and we
obey: (we seek) Thy forgiveness, our Lord, and to Thee is the end of all
journeys." S. 2:285
Behold! the angels said: "O Mary! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from
Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honor in this world and the
Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah. He shall speak to the people in
childhood and in maturity. And he shall be (of the company) of the righteous." She
said: "O my Lord! How shall I have a son when no man hath touched me?" He said:
"Even so; Allah createth what He willeth: When He hath decreed a plan, He but saith
to it, Be, and it is! And Allah will teach him THE BOOK and Wisdom,
the Torah and the Gospel," S. 3:45-48
"O you who believe! believe in Allah and His Messenger and the Book which He
has revealed to His Messenger and THE BOOK which He revealed before;
and whoever disbelieves in Allah and His angels and His messengers and the
last day, he indeed strays off into a remote error." S. 4:136
Then will Allah say: "O Jesus the son of Mary! Recount My favor to thee and to thy
mother. Behold! I strengthened thee with the Holy Spirit, so that thou didst speak to the
people in childhood and in maturity. Behold! I taught thee THE BOOK and Wisdom, the
Torah and the Gospel. And behold! thou makest out of clay, as it were, the figure of a
bird, by My leave, and thou breathest into it and it becometh a bird by My leave, and thou
healest those born blind, and the lepers, by My leave. And behold! thou bringest forth the
dead by My leave. And behold! I did restrain the Children of Israel from (violence to)
thee when thou didst show them the Clear Signs, and the unbelievers among them said:
This is nothing but evident magic." S. 5:110
(To his son came the command): "O John! take hold of THE BOOK with
might": and We gave him Wisdom even as a youth, S. 19:12
"But We had not given them BOOKS which they could study, nor sent
messengers to them before thee as Warners." S. 34:44
We sent aforetime OUR MESSENGERS with Clear Signs and sent down WITH THEM
THE BOOK and the Balance (of Right and Wrong), that men may stand forth in justice;
and We sent down Iron, in which is great might, as well as many benefits for mankind, that
Allah may test who it is that will help, Unseen, Him and His messengers: For Allah is Full
of Strength, Exalted in Might. And We sent Noah and Abraham, and established in their
line Prophethood and Revelation: and some of them were on right guidance, but many of
them became rebellious transgressors. Then, in their wake, We followed them up with
(others of) Our messengers: We sent after them Jesus the son of Mary, and bestowed on
him the Gospel; and We ordained in the hearts of those who followed him Compassion and
Mercy. But the Monasticism which they invented for themselves, We did not prescribe for
them: (We commanded) only the seeking for the Good Pleasure of Allah; but that they did
not foster as they should have done. Yet We bestowed, on those among them who believed,
their (due) reward, but many of them are rebellious transgressors. S. 57:25-27
And Mary the daughter of Imran, who guarded her chastity; and We breathed into (her
body) of Our spirit; and she testified to the truth of the words of her Lord and of
His BOOKS (Kutubihii), and was one of the devout (servants). S. 66:12
These passages state that God taught Jesus the Taurat AND THE BOOK, that John was to
take hold of the BOOK, that Mary believed in the BOOKS of God, and that messengers were
sent with THE BOOK/BOOKS. These references clearly prove that the Book which John, Jesus,
Mary and the Messengers knew and handed down included more than just the Taurat. Seeing
that the Book which John, Jesus and Mary were familiar with and believed in was none other
than the Old Testament as we now know it reinforces the claim that the Quran confirms
the Holy Bible as God's Word.
This is supported by the following statement taken from a tenth century
Islamic work:
A Statement about the Torah, WHICH IS IN THE HANDS OF THE JEWS,
with the Names of Their Books and Information about Their Scholars and Authors.
When I asked one of their notable men about these matters, he said, "God,
honor to His name, revealed to Moses the Torah IN FIVE FIFTHS,
each fifth divided into two parts and each part into a number of farasat,
which means surahs, with every farasah divided inot a number of
absuqat, meaning verses."
He said that there is a book of Moses called the Mishnah, from which
the Jews derive the science of the law, with the religious ordinances and judgments.
It is a large book, its language being Kasdani [Sam- an old Babylonian form for
the people of Chaldea] and Hebrew. In addition to that there were among
THE BOOKS OF THE PROPHETS:
Joshua; Judges; the book of Samuel; the scripture of Isaiah; the scripture
of Jeremiah; the scripture of Ezekiel; Kings, which is the scripture of David
and his associates, known as "Malkha al-Muluk"; the Prophets, comprising
twelve minor scriptures. There are also books called the Haftaroth derived from
the twelve prophets.
Among their books there are also:
Ezra; Daniel; Job; Song of Songs; Lamentations; Ruth; Ecclesiastes; Psalms
of David; Proverbs of Solomon; Record of the Days [Chronicles], containing
the history of the kings and accounts about them; Ahasuerus, called Megillah
[Esther]. (Abu 'l-Faraj Muhammad ibn Ishaq al-Nadim, The Fihrist - A 10th
Century AD Survey of Islamic Culture, edited and translated by Bayard
Dodge [Great Books of the Islamic World, Inc., Columbia University Press, 1970],
pp. 43-44; bold and capital emphasis ours)
And:
Remarks about the Gospel of the Christians, the Names of Their Books,
Their Scholars, and Their Authors
I asked Yunus the priest, who was an excellent man, about
the books translated into the Arabic language which they expound and according
to which they act. He replied, "Among them is the book Al-Surah (The
Form) which is divided into two parts, the Old Form and the
New Form." He also said that the "Old [Form]" was the ancient
basis for the Jewish sect and the "New [Form]" for the sect of the Christians.
He also said that the "Old [Form]" depends upon a number of books, the first
of which is the Torah, WHICH IS FIVE SACRED WRITINGS. [Then follows]
a compilation comprising a number of books, among which are:
Joshua, the Son of Nun; The Tribes, which is the book of Judges; Samuel
and the Judgment of David; Traditions of the Children of Israel; Ecclesiastes
[Qoheleth]; The Song of Songs; The Wisdom of Jesus, the Son of Sirach
[Ecclesiasticus]. The Prophets, composed offour books; Isaiah the prophet,
for whom be peace; Jeremiah the prophet, for whom be peace; The Twelve
Prophets, for whom be peace; Ezekiel. The New Form which is comprised of
four Gospels: The Gospel of Matthew; The Gospel of Mark; The Gospel of Luke;
The Gospel of John, The Disciples, known as Fraksis [Acts]; PAUL THE APOSTLE,
twenty four epistles. (Ibid., p. 45; bold and capital emphasis ours)
In fact, we are told by Al-Tabari that:
"According to Hisham (b. Yusuf) - Khalid b. Sa'id - his father, Sa'id b. Amr
b. Sa'id: When Amr b. Sa'id saw that the people looked up to Ibn al-Zubayr
and were anxious to support him, he thought that these matters would end in
his favor. He sent to Abdallah b. Amr b. Al-As, who was a companion of his,
he had been with his father in Egypt. There he had read THE BOOKS OF
DANIEL. At that time, Quraysh regarded him as a scholar." (History
of Al-Tabari, The Caliphate of Yazid B. Mu-Awiyah , trans. I.K.A Howard
[State University of New York Press], Volume 19, p. 193; bold emphasis ours)
[Note] 647. [on this page states,] This is probably a reference to the Old Testament.
These factors reinforce my accusation that Meherally willfully deceives his readers
by withholding relevant information and deliberately promoting falsehood, or is very
incompetent and should not attempt to address or rebut things that our well out of
his comprehension.
CHALLENGE TO MEHERALLY: I put this back on Meherally.
It is incumbent upon him to provide hard evidence that the "Book", "Scripture",
or "Bible" that the Christians in the Hijaz had with them and read was
other than today's Bible. The only Scriptures known to be available to the Christians
in the Hijaz is essentially today's Bible. There are different canons of Scripture,
but, their message is essentially the same (crucifixion of Christ, Jesus as the Son
of God). Over and over again Muhammad referred to a "Book",
"Scripture", or "Bible" that the Christians had with them
and read. Meherally, what actual "Book", "Scripture", or
"Bible" did the Christians of Muhammad抯 time possess? We need
evidence, not conjecture; we need facts, not ad-hominem personal attacks.
MEHERALLY:
WHAT IS MENTIONED IN THE QUR'AN?
The Book of Abraham
In the Qur'an (87 : 19), there appears the mention of "The Book of Abraham".
This "Book of Abraham"
does not appear at all within the 66 Books of the Protestant Bible nor within the
73 Books of the Catholic Bible, in circulation today.